Landmines: "Reaping What Has Been Sown"

©A.Raffaele Ciriello
[photo by A.Raffaele Ciriello]
Kabul, Karte Seh Hospital
[© A. Raffaele Ciriello | www.ciriello.com]

By Mir Hekmatullah Sadat
January-March 2000
Lemar-Aftaab

During the Cold War, superpowers and regional neighbors supplied and supervised million of landmines being sown into Afghan soil. Kabul became the world's most heavily mined city because of a bitter war among various factions (Gannon, 1997).

Why is this such a horrifying ordeal? What makes anti-personnel and anti-tank landmines so abhorrent is the indiscriminate destruction they cause. Mines cannot be aimed. They lie dormant until a person, animal, or vehicle triggers their detonating mechanism.

Two principles of the laws of war, discrimination and proportionality apply to the use of landmines regardless of other treaty obligations.

Coupland (1999) says that "disciplined armies train their soldiers in the laws of war, which include respect for the civilian population; by contrast, modern wars tend to be fought by forces that are poorly trained and may even target civilians."

Faulker (1997) explains further that "In recent wars we have seen:

  1. Random and widespread mining of agricultural and community land
  2. Deliberate use of mines as an anti-morale, or terror weapon targeting civilians
  3. Mining of villages, water sources, religious shrines."

The laws of war dictate that soldiers and their weapons discriminate between soldiers and civilians. However, antipersonnel mines cannot distinguish between the footfall of a soldier and that of a child.

The second principle states there is to be a balance between military need and consequences to the civilian population. Proponents of landmines focus on the cost-effectiveness of the weapon. But when they talk about the effects of landmines, they confine themselves to the duration of the battle. They do not address the life cycle of the landmine, which continues for decades. Clearly when the life of the weapon and the resulting impact of generations of civilians are taken into account, the cost-effectiveness of landmines is dwarfed by their long-term socio-economic impact.

Leading producers and exporters of antipersonnel mines include China, Italy, the former Soviet Union, and the United States. There are approximately 100 companies in more than 50 countries that manufactured as many as 200 million antipersonnel landmines in the last 25 years.

According to the organization GOLIATH, " It costs about $3US to buy a landmine, but it costs $3,000US to remove it safely from the ground."

Between 2 to 5 million landmines are planted annually. More than 350 different types of antipersonnel mines exist. Even if no more mines are ever laid, they will continue to maim and kill for years to come. About 100 countries worldwide are affected by landmines. At the present effort of demining, it is estimated it will require 1,100 years and 33 billion dollars to eradicate the landmines that now lay planted.

Afghanistan is where the United Nations first became involved in supporting the creation and development of a humanitarian mine action program. The signing of the Geneva Accords in April 1988, and the withdrawal of Soviet troops from Afghanistan, led many to believe that warfare had come to an end, that peace would prevail, and that the rehabilitation of social services and infrastructure could begin.

In 1988, landmines were seen primarily as a military problem which needed to be addressed on an urgent basis to reduce the risk of fatalities and injury to millions of civilians including, in particular, those about to return home in a massive repatriation program then deemed imminent. This was the context within which the United Nations undertook initial planning for the development of mine action activities in Afghanistan.

Events did not unfold as anticipated. Sporadic warfare and instability continue to characterize the political landscape of Afghanistan and directly impacted the population movements and the coping capacity of affected communities. In periods of relative stability, significant numbers of people returned to their native villages and began the arduous task of rebuilding their homes, their farms, and crucial irrigation systems. But just as peace has gained a foothold in some parts of the country, armed conflict continues to up-root people and to destroy basic means of survival elsewhere.

This is the context which has shaped the orientation, and development of mine action activities since 1992 when the landmine problem was redefined and greater emphasis was given to socio-economic concerns and the development of a systematic and strategic response.

Mines recognize no cease-fire, and long after the fighting has stopped, they continue to maim or kill. In a 1998 Internet article of L'HEBDO, Alex Grinling explains that mines have been put in residential zones. Under nine feet of rubble, these explosives can still be found everywhere. There are good mechanical contraptions, but in these zones they are useless because of the detailed precision that is needed.

Wars are not only traumatic for soldiers but are especially damaging to civilian morale. In particular, children in crises can experience various developmental delays and psychosocial disorders. About 55% of landmine victims in Kabul are children. In the last 20 years, these children have only known constant warfare. In Kabul, 65% of children have seen their family members die. It is while spelling the name of weapons that they learned to read. Refugees returning to their war-ravaged countries face this life-threatening obstacle to rebuilding their lives.

There are two categories of landmines: antipersonnel (AP) and antitank or anti-vehicle (AT).

An AP is a mine designed to be exploded by the presence, proximity or contact of a person and that will incapacitate, injure or kill one or more persons.

An AT mines is a device designed to detonate by more than 100 kilograms of pressure and cannot distinguish between a tank and tractor.

There are different types of A mines according to the types of injuries they inflict:

  • Blast mine: usually hand-laid on or under the ground or scattered from the air. The explosive force of the mine causes foot, leg, and groin injuries and secondary infections usually result in amputation.

  • Fragmentation mine: usually laid on or under the ground and often activated by tripwire or other means. When detonated, the explosion projects hundreds of fragments at ballistic speeds of up to 50 meters resulting in fragmentation wounds. Some fragmentation mines contain a primary charge to lift the mine above the ground (about 1 to 1.5 meters) before detonating which can injure an adult's abdomen, genitals or decapitate a child.

New developments in mine technology:

  • Plastic mine: Undetectable by metal detectors used by deminers.
  • Remotely delivere (R/D) or scatterable mines: Usually disseminated from aircraft, helicopters or artillery. Accurate mapping, recording and marking mines laid in this manner is impossible.
  • Anti-handlin devices: A device intended to protect mine and which activates when an attempt is made to tamper with or otherwise intentionally disturb the mine.
  • Self-destruct (S/D) mines: So-called "smart" mines are designed to self-destruct after a designated period of time. If they fail to self-destruct, these mines are also sometimes designed to self-deactivate. There is nothing smart about these mines, though - while armed they cannot discriminate between the footfall of a soldier and a civilian.

Those who survive the initial blast usually require amputations, long hospital stays, and extensive rehabilitative services. According to The Economist, "Every 20 minutes or so, somewhere someone is killed or injured by a landmine."

A recent 1999 article in the British Medical Journal reflects a study of patients admitted to all Red Cross hospitals by cause of injury. About 68% percent of patients are admitted because of bullet, bombshell, mortar, or mine injuries. Of these patients, about one out of four are admitted for mine related injuries. Roughly 31% of these patients suffering from mine-related injuries are civilians.

Hence, a greater proportion of civilians are injured by mines than expected due in part to being injured by virtually invisible weapons. In most of these cases, an amputee receives an artificial leg known in medicine as prosthesis.

A prosthetic device is named according to the level of the amputation. Some examples of prosthesis are below/above knee. symes, below/above elbow, and also shoulder disarticulation prosthesis.

About 3% of Afghanistan's current approximated population has been physically disabled in the lasting conflict. Many specialists such as Burns (1996) attribute that to "Brezhnev and Reagan and Thatcher who made the country a Cold-War battleground in the 1980s, and played their own roles in the wasteland that Afghanistan has become."

According to L'HEBDO magazine, the Red Cross' orthopedic centers in Afghanistan have manufactured more than 10,000 prostheses from recycled plastics (3,500 armchairs, canes, and rolls) imported from Switzerland.

Throughout the country, with four centers, the Red Cross is the main producer of prostheses: since 1988, more than 25,000 Afghans have been taken care of in their facilities. Up to 80% among them were civilians.

Burns (1996) adds that since the religious movement's severe restrictions on women, extreme shortcomings have resulted: "Because of a widespread fear among women of venturing into the streets, the number of disabled women seeking help at the Kabul center, and of disabled children brought in by their mothers, has fallen."

Moreover, Jane's Information Group's February 1999 report suggests that the regime in Kabul has been laying new minefields to protect themselves from attack by rival factions.

As a result, Afghanistan has become one of the most heavily source: Organization for Mine clearance and Afghan Rehabilitation (OMAR) mined areas; there are more than 10 million landmines that have not been cleared yet. Most of these mines hinder everyday life, being placed around water sources and along many roads.

Mines render large tracts of agricultural land unusable, wreaking environmental and economic devastation. In Afghanistan, around 35% of the land is unusable due millions of buried landmines. Landmines are now a daily threat in Afghanistan; many die in the fields from loss of blood or lack of transport to get medical help.

Giannou (1997) details such mine-related problems: "Antipersonnel mines have disabled individuals, handicapped families, and mutilated entire societies. Their effects are widespread and continue long after a conflict has ended. The mining of agricultural land results in a severe loss of income for farmers;malnutrition increases; people are forced from their homes because families cannot eke out an existence; there is an increase in casualties among returning refugees; repatriation of displaced persons or refugees may be delayed or totally compromised; and if roads are affected, rural ammunisation campaigns by mobile teams, the provision of emergency relief supplies, and the resumption of normal commercial activity are blocked."

Faulkner (1997) adds: "The impact on rural communities can be devastating, as landmines attack several activities vital for sustaining the population. The grazing of livestock has its attendant hazards in heavily mined areas; domesticated animals tend to migrate in search of the best available feeding grounds, which can often lead herds into unmarked minefields. Not only does this imperil the people (including children) charged with tending herds, but livestock depletion inevitably removes part of a vital resource. The practice of mining water sources also presents its own problems; in some countries, clean water may be several miles away, which means that children and women may have to run the gauntlet of suspect tracks, wells and streams in order to provide for the community's needs."

The following proposals by Nathanson and Giannou are the most applicable and feasible procedures for Afghanistan:

  • "We have to educate donors that the 100 countries riddled with land mines and unexploded ordinance will need a long term commitment to demining and rehabilitation. Demining can take place only where there is access to the land, and where it is not going to be seized by the military and remined immediately. Patients and their access to care need to be protected and the security of deminers and aid workers assured" (Nathanson, 1998).

  • "After a civil conflict, scarce funds must be used for mine clearance, mine awareness, and tertiary curative medicine. The landmine pandemic is a social, economic, health, and political event that particularly targets the innocent, the weakest, and the least prepared. The response must therefore also have social, economic, health, and political aspects and it must include preventive, curative, and rehabilitative measures...For each area affected, the priorities--mine clearance, education, health services, repairing economic infrastructure--need to be identified and action targeted" (Giannou, 1997).

In this overview, we have examined the issue of landmines in relation to many social aspects of Afghanistan. However, one point that has been neglected is the productivity of physically challenged men and women in the labor market. The labor pool has been depleted due to deaths and/or flight from Afghanistan (most of whom will not repatriate).

So, the sixty-four dollar question is how can the physically challenged become active contributors to the welfare of society?

If this question is not addressed, then these persons will become dependent on the charity of a country that is among the poorest in the world. The resulting phenomena would be such things as psychological depression, which could stem from or turn into pane handling, addiction, or even suicide.

©A.Raffaele Ciriello
[photo by A.Raffaele Ciriello]
Kabul, Karte Seh Hospital
[© A. Raffaele Ciriello | www.ciriello.com]



References

Acknowledgments: A special thanks to A. Raffaele Ciriello (www.ciriello.com) and Harry Hayes for granting permission to use their photographs.


About the Author: Mir Hekmatullah Sadat

Other work by Mir Hekmatullah Sadat:





Copyright © 2000 Aftaabzad Publications. All Rights Reserved.
May not be duplicated or distributed in any form without permission.